Vol.15, No.3, August 2026.                                                                                                                                                                          ISSN: 2217-8309

                                                                                                                                                                                                                        eISSN: 2217-8333

 

TEM Journal

 

TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION, MANAGEMENT, INFORMATICS

Association for Information Communication Technology Education and Science

 

Thinking Two-Way and One Goal: Development of Inductive-Deductive Devices with Cognitive Conflict for Problem Solving

 

Rusmini Rusmini, Dian Armanto, Mukhtar Mukhtar

 

© 2026 Rusmini Rusmini, published by UIKTEN. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

 

Citation Information: TEM Journal. Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages 2744-2756, ISSN 2217-8309, DOI: 10.18421/TEM153-61, August 2026.

 

Received: 24 September 2025.
Revised: 11 February 2026.
Accepted: 04 March 2026.
Published: 27 August 2026.

 

Abstract:

 

Thinking Two-Way and One Purpose is a representation of the deep learning paradigm. Two directions are the path, one goal is the achievement: tested problem-solving skills and continuous understanding of concepts. This research aims to develop a mathematics learning tool based on an inductive-deductive thinking model combined with cognitive conflict strategies to improve the mathematical problem-solving ability of junior high school students. This model is designed so that students are able to think both ways, from pattern to principle and from principle to case, the end goal of building a complete and flexible conceptual understanding. The Plomp model consists of three main phases: initial investigation, design, and realization. The instruments include expert validation sheets, pre-test-post-test problem-solving questions, student and teacher response questionnaires. The validation results obtained by the device are in the very valid category, with an average score of > 3.5. Practicality was obtained from the positive response of students and teachers, on average above 75%. Effectiveness is proven through improving students’ mathematical problem-solving skills. Average N-Gain is medium to high category. These findings show that the developed tools are feasible, practical, and effective for use in mathematics learning that emphasizes reasoning reinforcement and problem-solving.

 

Keywords – Inductive-deductive thinking, cognitive conflict, problem-solving, device development.

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Full text PDF >  

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 


Copyright © 2026 UIKTEN
Copyright licence: All articles are licenced via Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 licence